Yes, that's a fair point. However, one of the key things I want to get across is:
the nice thing about the integration of java.util.logging with WAS is that the trace configuration is separate from the application. This means that when building my application I don't have to think about what the target environment is and therefore set my tracing configuration at build time e.g. make sure that debug trace is off for a live deployment. It also means in that live environment I can enable debug tracing for a very short time to diagnose a particular problem without disrupting my application.
Of course that is a very specific use case and will not be practical for example in COBOL generated applications or Java command line apps. Main thing is to get a more flexible logging framework in place.
I fully agree with you and figured as much that was your goal. But what I wanted to point out is basically two things:
And do not forget Cobol generation !

...and support/integrate this functionality also with the declarative tracing capabilities as set via properties within the build descriptor (that might end up in a deployment descriptor for those deploying in a JEE environment).