<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>IBM Rational Cafés : Unanswered Threads - COBOL Café</title>
    <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/community/cobol?view=discussions&amp;filter=open</link>
    <description>Unanswered Discussion Threads in COBOL Café</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:59:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 1.10.7 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-24T10:59:30Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>XPLINK?</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2980</link>
      <description>Will 64-bit COBOL use the XPLINK linkage convention?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:59:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>bnet</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2980</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-24T10:59:30Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 hour, 41 minutes ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>container storage</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2930</link>
      <description>Will using channels and containers for storage and transfer to MQ API alleviate memory problems that are occuring when issuing a getmain command, or is there a more efficient method of data transfer</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:00:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>gwis_64</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2930</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-11T21:00:46Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 days, 17 hours ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>7</clearspace:messageCount>
      <clearspace:replyCount>6</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>converting assembler (ALC) code to cobol code</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2760</link>
      <description />
      <category domain="http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/tags?communityID=2033">cobol</category>
      <category domain="http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/tags?communityID=2033">alc</category>
      <category domain="http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/tags?communityID=2033">conversion</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>ppalaval</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2760</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-30T09:33:55Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 month, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RDz, COBOL and Automatically uppercasing</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2707</link>
      <description>Ok, I just installed RDz 7.5 and I can't for the life of me find in the preferences where I can have the LPex editor automatically uppercase my COBOL code.  Can someone please help me out?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:22:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>gunner3200</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2707</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-18T15:22:18Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>2 weeks, 4 days ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>11</clearspace:messageCount>
      <clearspace:replyCount>10</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DRAFT COBOL revision</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2688</link>
      <description>For those (if any) who care, the latest (August 2009) draft of the ongoing revision of the ISO COBOL Standard can be found from the PL22.4 home page at:</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>wmklein</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2688</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-16T03:50:11Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>2 months, 1 week ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Possible Reasons for "No Response from TSO Command Server"</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2584</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:01:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>jsayles</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2584</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-08-24T18:01:13Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 months, 1 day ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COBOL COPY REPLACING interactions with REPLACE directives</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2572</link>
      <description>Can someone explain how COPY and REPLACE compiler directives interact?</description>
      <category domain="http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/tags?communityID=2029">cobol</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:26:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>NealB</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2572</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-08-21T16:26:33Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>2 months, 4 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>5</clearspace:messageCount>
      <clearspace:replyCount>4</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>z Through Eclipse Glasses</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2566</link>
      <description>A superb article by Larry England and Steve Ma on the use of Eclipse to simplfiy and modernize z/OS developmnt wok. 
 
 
 http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/docs/DOC-3233?approved=true 

Definitely worth the read.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:25:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>jsayles</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2566</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-08-20T17:25:16Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 months, 5 days ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'old' PL/1 applications fails compiling with Enterprise PL/1 compiler ?</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2529</link>
      <description>Have anyone experienced problems trying to compile 'old' PL/1 programs using the current Enterprise PL/1 compiler ? 
 
Is there some doc showing what type of PL/1 statements will fail ? 

Morten Hansen</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:23:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>moha</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2529</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-08-12T19:23:25Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>3 months, 1 week ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New draft of revision for next COBOL Standard</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2460</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:00:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>wmklein</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2460</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-07-24T03:00:27Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>4 months, 3 days ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Job monitor Display equivalent to the DA OJOB in SDSF</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2457</link>
      <description>For those that might be interested you can display in the Job monitor information equivalent to the DA OJOB in SDSF by:</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>dana</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2457</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-07-23T12:54:49Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>4 months, 3 days ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rational Developer for System z - Two Modules Available in the IBM COBOL Class</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2283</link>
      <description>Offered during our beta-lifecycle, you can learn COBOL using RDz by following online slides - reading notes, and doing labs. Here are the modules - and recommended learning order:</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 10:19:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>jsayles</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2283</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-31T10:19:15Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 3 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>White Paper on COBOL Programmer #s and Best Practices -</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2274</link>
      <description>From Capers Jones - a must read:   http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/docs/DOC-3137</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:59:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>jsayles</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2274</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-28T22:59:40Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>5 months, 4 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Classes of COBOL Maintenance and % of Lifecyle Effort in Various Phases</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2236</link>
      <description>Hey guys - along the lines of hSigmond52's question ... I read a white paper some time ago, from I think it was some small consulting company in New England that presented these stats:</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:31:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>scott197</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2236</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-18T22:31:18Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>6 months, 1 week ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>1</clearspace:messageCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cobol calls oo enterprise cobol which invokes java method STDOUT issues</title>
      <link>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2187</link>
      <description>Hi to all members in the caf&amp;eacute;,</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:14:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>RolandLeander</author>
      <guid>http://www-949.ibm.com/software/rational/cafe/thread/2187</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-07T12:14:14Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>6 months, 2 weeks ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:messageCount>9</clearspace:messageCount>
      <clearspace:replyCount>8</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

